Inhibition of DNA-PK with AZD7648 Sensitizes Tumor Cells to Radiotherapy and Induces Type I IFN-Dependent Durable Tumor Control.

PURPOSE: Combining radiotherapy (RT) with DNA damage response inhibitors may lead to increased tumor cell death through radiosensitization. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) plays an important role in DNA double-strand break repair via the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. We hypothesized that in addition to a radiosensitizing effect from the combination of RT with AZD7648, a potent and specific inhibitor of DNA-PK, combination therapy may also lead to modulation of an anticancer immune response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: AZD7648 and RT efficacy, as monotherapy and in combination, was investigated in fully immunocompetent mice in MC38, CT26, and B16-F10 models. Immunologic consequences were analyzed by gene expression and flow-cytometric analysis. RESULTS: AZD7648, when delivered in combination with RT, induced complete tumor regressions in a significant proportion of mice. The antitumor efficacy was dependent on the presence of CD8+ T cells but independent of NK cells. Analysis of the tumor microenvironment revealed a reduction in T-cell PD-1 expression, increased NK-cell granzyme B expression, and elevated type I IFN signaling in mice treated with the combination when compared with RT treatment alone. Blocking of the type I IFN receptor in vivo also demonstrated a critical role for type I IFN in tumor growth control following combined therapy. Finally, this combination was able to generate tumor antigen-specific immunologic memory capable of suppressing tumor growth following rechallenge. CONCLUSIONS: Blocking the NHEJ DNA repair pathway with AZD7648 in combination with RT leads to durable immune-mediated tumor control.

Investigating the Value of Urine Volume, Creatinine, and Cystatin C for Urinary Biomarkers Normalization for Drug Development Studies.

Novel urinary protein biomarkers have recently been identified and qualified in rats for the early detection of renal injury in drug development studies. However, there seems to be no standardized normalization method for analyzing these urinary biomarkers, as some users normalize with urinary creatinine (uCr), urine volume (uVol), or leave biomarker un-normalized. More recently, urinary cystatin C is also emerging as a urinary biomarker normalizer, given some of its characteristics as a glomerular filtration marker. The purpose of this study was to identify an optimal drug-induced kidney injury biomarker normalization method that can be adopted more uniformly in the field. To this end, we compared the variability of uVol, urinary cystatin C, and Cr in healthy rats; we evaluated the sensitivity of the renal biomarkers to renal injury after normalization with uVol, uCr, and cystatin C in rats with cisplatin-induced renal injury. We showed that, over time, uCr was less variable than urinary cystatin C and uVol. When the renal biomarkers were normalized with the 3 normalizing end points, the biomarkers showed (1) least variability following normalization with Cr in healthy animals and (2) poor sensitivity when normalized with urinary cystatin C in animals with renal injury. Overall, the results suggested that uCr is better than urinary cystatin C and uVol for normalizing renal biomarkers in rats under controlled preclinical conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first report that compared the variability of uVol, cystatin C, and Cr in the context of renal biomarkers' normalization.

Evaluation of novel urinary renal biomarkers: biological variation and reference change values.

A number of novel urinary biomarkers have been identified and partially qualified for use as markers for renal injury in rats. We used two multiplex assays for these novel biomarkers to quantify biomarker concentration in serial urine collections from rats of both sexes administered varying concentrations of cisplatin. From these data, we calculate inter-individual variation and reference ranges from predose animals and intra-individual variation and reference change values from undosed control animals. The biomarkers evaluated are albumin, α glutathione s-transferase, glutathione S-transferase-yb1, lipocalin-2, kidney injury molecule-1, osteopontin, and renal papillary antigen 1. For any creatinine-corrected novel biomarkers, we found intra-individual variation to be no greater than 44% and inter-individual variation to be no greater than 46%. Reference change values for most corrected analytes (except osteopontin) were 50-100%, indicating that a >100% increase in analyte concentration between serial samples would be unlikely to be associated with inherent analytical or biological variation.

Evaluation of novel urinary renal biomarkers with a cisplatin model of kidney injury: effects of collection period.

A number of novel urinary biomarkers have been identified and partially qualified for use as markers for renal injury in rats. To date, all evaluation studies have been made using 18 to 24 hour collection periods. However, shorter, more welfare friendly, urine collection periods are also used in industry. In this article, we quantify urinary biomarker concentration in serial paired sequential short and long urine collections from male rats administered varying concentrations of cisplatin. We calculate the rate of biomarker excretion in normal animals for both collection periods and the bias and correlation in urinary biomarker concentration between collection periods in dosed and control animals, and we estimate the level of agreement in biomarker concentration between both collection periods. We conclude that although there are minor differences in the concentration of some urinary biomarkers that are dependent upon the time and duration of collection, shorter collection protocols do not influence subsequent interpretation of normalized urinary biomarker data for most biomarkers.